Financial entities adopt an ICT business continuity policy within their overall continuity policy and implement it through documented arrangements that keep critical or important functions running, contain and resolve incidents, estimate preliminary impacts, and drive crisis communication and reporting under Articles 14 and 19; they run a business impact analysis, keep ICT response and recovery plans, test, at least once a year and after substantive changes, the continuity and response plans for the systems behind every function, test crisis communication plans, and keep records of activity during disruptions. Entities other than microenterprises additionally have the response and recovery plans reviewed by independent internal audit (Art. 11(3)), include cyber-attack and switchover scenarios in testing (Art. 11(6)), run a crisis management function (Art. 11(7)), and estimate aggregated annual costs and losses of major incidents when the authority asks (Art. 11(10)). Central securities depositories also send continuity test results to the authority (Art. 11(9)). Entities listed in Article 16(1) are outside this Article and follow the simplified framework of Article 16 instead.
Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk·Verified against the published standard ·Control text last updated
What else in your programme already covers this
This control maps to 59 controls across 16 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
You are reading one control. How much of DORA have you already done?
DORA DORA-Art.11 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of DORA your existing evidence covers. Hold NIS2 Directive and 17 of 26 DORA controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIS2 Directive pair alone.