ISO 22301:2019
Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019

ISO 22301:2019 9.2.1: General

Hold internal audits at planned intervals to find out whether the BCMS satisfies both the standard and what the organization itself requires of its BCMS, and whether it is put into practice and kept up effectively.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 27 controls across 16 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08 Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
  • NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01 Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
  • NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09 Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MA-02 Incident reports are triaged and validated

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 5.35 Independent review of information security

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

  • 12.1.1 12.1.1 Overall information security policy established and disseminated
  • 12.1.2 12.1.2 Security policy reviewed annually and updated as needed
  • 2.1.1 2.1.1 Requirement 2 policies and procedures governed
  • CPS230-16 Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
  • 45 Para 45 Internal audit periodic review and assurance on the BCP

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.35 Independent review of information security

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.1 CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-COM-03 Internal audits of the information security management system

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

COBIT 2019 · 1 control

  • MEA04.06 MEA04.06 Execute the assurance initiative, focusing on design effectiveness

FedRAMP High · 1 control

  • CA-2 Control Assessments

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

  • CA-2 Control Assessments

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 22301:2019 have you already done?

ISO 22301:2019 9.2.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and 28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 27 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.