FedRAMP High
CP - Contingency Planning

FedRAMP High CP-6(1): Alternate Storage Site | Separation from Primary Site. Identify an alternate storage site that is sufficiently separated from the primary storage site to reduce susceptibility to the same threats

Alternate Storage Site | Separation from Primary Site. Identify an alternate storage site that is sufficiently separated from the primary storage site to reduce susceptibility to the same threats

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 13 controls across 9 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 7.5 Protecting against physical and environmental threats
  • 8.13 Information backup

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • CFTC-SS-10 Geographic Dispersal of Backup Infrastructure and Personnel

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

  • CIS-11.4 Establish and Maintain an Isolated Instance of Recovery Data

DORA · 1 control

  • DORA-Art.12 Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 9.4.1.2 Offsite backup location reviewed

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CP - Contingency Planning

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High CP-6(1) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 13 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.