FedRAMP Moderate CP-7(2): Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility. Identify potential accessibility problems to alternate processing sites in the event of an area-wide disruption or disaster and outlines explicit mitigation actions

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 7 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 5 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03 Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04 Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03 Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04 Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-04 Critical mission functions and cybersecurity risk management are considered to establish post-incident operational norms

SOC 2 · 5 controls

SOC2-A1.1 Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments
SOC2-A1.3 Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
SOC2-CC3.4 COSO principle 9: Identifies and assesses changes that could impact internal controls
SOC2-CC6.4 Restricts physical access to facilities and protected information assets (for example, data center facilities, back-up media storage, and other sensitive locations) to authorized personnel to meet the entity's objectives
SOC2-CC9.1 Identifies, selects and develops risk mitigation activities

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

5.29 Information security during disruption
5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

5.29 Information security during disruption
5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IVS-02 Capacity and Resource Planning

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-CP-7 Alternate processing site

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate CP-7(2) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free