Put in place and keep up a response structure that allows relevant interested parties to be warned and informed in good time. It needs plans and procedures for steering the organization through a disruption and for triggering the continuity solutions, identified and documented from the strategies and solutions that were selected, and procedures that are specific about the first steps to take, adaptable as internal and external conditions change, centred on the impact of incidents, effective at keeping that impact small, and clear about roles and responsibilities.
This control maps to 45 controls across 24 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
NIST-CSF-GV.OC-03 Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including privacy and civil liberties obligations - are understood and managed
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03 Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02 Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04 Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
You are reading one control. How much of ISO 22301:2019 have you already done?
ISO 22301:2019 8.4.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and 28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management pair alone.