ISO 22301:2019
Operation, ISO 22301:2019

ISO 22301:2019 8.3.2: Identification of strategies and solutions

Identify possible strategies and solutions according to how far they would: keep prioritized activities going, or recover them, within the time frames identified and at the capacity agreed; protect those activities; make a disruption less likely; make it shorter; reduce its effect on products and services; and make sure enough resources are available.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 55 controls across 23 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 9 controls

FedRAMP High · 4 controls

  • CP-6 Alternate Storage Site
  • CP-7 Alternate Processing Site
  • CP-8 Telecommunications Services
  • PE-17 Alternate Work Site

FedRAMP Moderate · 4 controls

  • CP-6 Alternate Storage Site
  • CP-7 Alternate Processing Site
  • CP-8 Telecommunications Services
  • PE-17 Alternate Work Site

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 7.11 Supporting utilities
  • 8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.21 Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04 Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04 Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-06 Risk responses are chosen, prioritized, planned, tracked, and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03 Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-A1.3 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
  • SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
  • SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
  • SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

CMMC 2.0 · 3 controls

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-11.1 Establish and Maintain a Data Recovery Process
  • CIS-11.4 Establish and Maintain an Isolated Instance of Recovery Data

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

  • ASD37-36 System recovery capabilities (Very Good)

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • CFTC-SS-26 Own Resources or Contractual Arrangements to Meet the Recovery Objective

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 · 1 control

COBIT 2019 · 1 control

  • DSS04.02 DSS04.02 Maintain business resilience

DORA · 1 control

ISO 13485:2016 · 1 control

ISO 28002:2011 · 1 control

  • A.4.6 A.4.6 Strategic resilience plans and programmes

ISO 9001:2015 · 1 control

  • 8.3.2 Design and development planning

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 12.3.1 12.3.1 Targeted risk analysis for flexible-frequency requirements

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Operation, ISO 22301:2019

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 22301:2019 have you already done?

ISO 22301:2019 8.3.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and 28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 55 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.