FedRAMP High
CP - Contingency Planning

FedRAMP High CP-7(2): Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility (CP-7(2))

Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility. Identify potential accessibility problems to alternate processing sites in the event of an area-wide disruption or disaster and outlines explicit mitigation actions

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 20 controls across 9 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03 Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04 Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
  • NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03 Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
  • NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04 Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
  • NIST-CSF-RC.RP-04 Critical mission functions and cybersecurity risk management are considered to establish post-incident operational norms

SOC 2 · 5 controls

  • SOC2-A1.1 A1.1 Managing processing capacity
  • SOC2-A1.3 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
  • SOC2-CC3.4 CC3.4 Identifying and assessing significant changes (COSO principle 9)
  • SOC2-CC6.4 CC6.4 Restricting physical access to facilities and assets
  • SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • 8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

  • 8.3.4 Resource requirements
  • CP-7(2) CP-7(2) Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility
  • CP-7(2) CP-7(2) Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CP - Contingency Planning

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High CP-7(2) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 20 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.