Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-GS-8: Define and implement backup and recovery strategy

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 42 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 4 controls

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04 Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01 The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-04 Critical mission functions and cybersecurity risk management are considered to establish post-incident operational norms
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05 The criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management · 3 controls

CPS230-19 Tolerance Levels for Each Critical Operation
CPS230-26 Critical Operations Register, Continuity Plan and Activation
CPS230-P40 Required Content of the Business Continuity Plan

C5 (Germany) · 3 controls

C5-BCM-01 Top management responsibility
C5-BCM-02 Business impact analysis policies and instructions
C5-OPS-06 Data Backup and Recovery - Concept

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 3 controls

CFTC-SS-22 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning Category
CFTC-SS-8 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan and Resources
CFTC-SS-9 Next Business Day Recovery Time Objective

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 3 controls

CCM-BCR-01 Business Continuity Management Policy and Procedures
CCM-BCR-03 Business Continuity Strategy
CCM-BCR-04 Business Continuity Planning

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

5.29 Information security during disruption
5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
8.13 Information backup

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

5.29 Information security during disruption
5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
8.13 Information backup

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

CP-1 Policy and Procedures
CP-2 Contingency Plan

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

CP-1 Policy and Procedures
CP-2 Contingency Plan

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

164.308(a)(7)(i) Contingency Plan (Standard)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(B) Disaster Recovery Plan (Required)

ISO 22301:2019 · 2 controls

6.2.1 Establishing business continuity objectives
8.3.1 General

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-CP-1 CP-1 Policy and Procedures
NIST800-CP-2 CP-2 Contingency Plan

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

164.308(a)(7)(i) Contingency Plan (Standard)
164.308(a)(7)(ii)(B) Disaster Recovery Plan (Required)

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-A1.2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-BACKUP-ML1 Regular Backups (ML1)

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-37 Define and Apply a Backup Policy for Critical Components

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-35 Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-11.1 Establish and Maintain a Data Recovery Process

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-CP-2 Contingency Plan

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-GS-8 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 583.5% covered · 14 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate78.8% covered · 18 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.172.9% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202269.4% covered · 26 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)65.9% covered · 29 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202261.2% covered · 33 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free