TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity RequirementsvsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 50% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 4 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Training.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 4 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Security Plan(1 mappings)

USMTSA-1Facility Security Assessment and Plan
→IAEA-NSS17-Scope-NSS-Family-CSP-EstablishmentIAEA NSS-17 + NSS-42-G - Scope + Nuclear Security Series Family + Computer Security Programme Establishment + Roles + Management System Integration

Cyber Assessment(1 mappings)

USMTSA-2Cybersecurity Assessment and CSO Designation
→IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises

Related Comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs ISO/IEC 27400:20222 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements2 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs FedRAMP Rev 52 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems2 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts2 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security2 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs ISO/IEC 27010:20152 mappingsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements vs UK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements2 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)8 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)7 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)7 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements has 4 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Training, where 1 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 4 total US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls, 2 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

2 US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Training with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Training (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.