UK Cyber EssentialsvsFedRAMP Moderate
See exactly how UK Cyber Essentials controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK Cyber Essentials maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 100% coverage across 36 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 UK Cyber Essentials controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Security Update Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 103 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
User Access Control(20 mappings)
+83 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The UK Cyber Essentials to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing UK Cyber Essentials work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. UK Cyber Essentials into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 9.3%, while FedRAMP Moderate into UK Cyber Essentials lands at 80.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your UK Cyber Essentials evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.
30 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for UK Cyber Essentials. 293 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Both require account creation approved by an authorised individual before it exists.
Grounded in CE-AC.1 User Account Approval Process. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Develop and disseminate access control policy and procedures; review at least annually (FedRAMP parameter); update following defined events.
Every one of the 30 evidenced controls and 293 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
29 of 36 UK Cyber Essentials controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 7 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Account management requires documented approval of account creation requests by authorised personnel.
Grounded in AC-2 Account Management. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Where identity is established without a password, use a recognised passwordless method such as a FIDO2 authenticator or passkey, biometric, hardware security key or token, push notification or one-time code, and manage it as the...
Every one of the 29 evidenced controls and 7 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many UK Cyber Essentials controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other UK Cyber Essentials comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK Cyber Essentials and FedRAMP Moderate?
UK Cyber Essentials has 36 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 323 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 36 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Update Management, where 0 UK Cyber Essentials controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.
How many controls map between UK Cyber Essentials and FedRAMP Moderate?
Of 36 total UK Cyber Essentials controls, 36 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Cyber Essentials to FedRAMP Moderate?
0 UK Cyber Essentials controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Update Management with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Cyber Essentials and FedRAMP Moderate?
The domain with the highest gap count is Security Update Management (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.