Cross-Framework Mapping

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)vsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)

See exactly how Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls map to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) maps to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) with 18% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Cloud Security(1 mappings)

IM8-CLD.2Cloud Security Controls
NAIC-668-3Definitions

Governance(8 mappings)

IM8-GOV.2Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
7012(a)Definitions
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions
TNFD-GOV-CHuman Rights and Stakeholder Engagement5 targets
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation
MSA-14Joint Statements
MSA-15Voluntary Statements
MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery
MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities

Resilience(3 mappings)

IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery3 targets
7012(a)Definitions
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions

Architecture and Security(2 mappings)

IM8-SEC.4Vulnerability Management2 targets
MSA-16-1dCriterion 4: Actions Taken
NAIC-668-3Definitions

Third-Party Management(2 mappings)

IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks

Related Comparisons

Other Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) comparisons

Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) has 33 controls across its framework, while Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance, where 8 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls have no direct Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

Of 33 total Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls, 6 map directly to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

27 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls have no direct equivalent in Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Governance (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.