TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsMARS-E

See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to MARS-E. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to MARS-E with 50% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Open Management and Accountability(2 mappings)

AUPRV-1APP 1 Open and Transparent Management + Privacy Management Framework2 targets
→MARS-E-Audit-Accountability-Continuous-Monitoring-AU-Family-CM-Family-SIEM-Log-Retention-IRS-Pub-1075MARS-E Audit + Accountability + Continuous Monitoring + AU + CM Families + SIEM + IRS Pub 1075
→MARS-E-Privacy-PII-PHI-Minimum-Necessary-HIPAA-Privacy-Rule-NIST-800-122-45-CFR-164-Subpart-EMARS-E Privacy + PII + PHI + Minimum Necessary + HIPAA Privacy Rule + NIST 800-122 + 45 CFR 164 Subpart E

Quality and Security(6 mappings)

AUPRV-4APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information6 targets
→MARS-E-Access-Control-Identity-Authentication-NIST-800-63-Identity-Assurance-Levels-MFA-AC-IA-FamiliesMARS-E Access Control + Identity + Authentication + NIST 800-63 + MFA + AC + IA Families
→MARS-E-Contingency-Media-Protection-System-Integrity-CP-MP-SI-Families-DR-COOP-Encryption-SanitizationMARS-E Contingency + Media Protection + System Integrity + CP + MP + SI Families + DR + COOP
→MARS-E-Cross-Program-Coordination-IRS-Pub-1075-FedRAMP-CMS-ARS-HHS-OIG-Joint-Audit-3PAOMARS-E Cross-Program + IRS Pub 1075 + FedRAMP + CMS ARS + HHS OIG + Joint Audit + 3PAO
→MARS-E-Incident-Response-Breach-Notification-IR-Family-45-CFR-164-400-414-IRS-Pub-1075-Notification-CMS-IRTMARS-E Incident Response + Breach Notification + IR Family + 45 CFR 164.400-414 + IRS Pub 1075 + CMS IRT
→MARS-E-NIST-800-53-Moderate-Baseline-Catalog-v2-0-Volume-III-Tailoring-Risk-Assessment-CategorizationMARS-E NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline + MARS-E Catalog Volume III + Tailoring + Risk Assessment + Categorization
→MARS-E-Privacy-PII-PHI-Minimum-Necessary-HIPAA-Privacy-Rule-NIST-800-122-45-CFR-164-Subpart-EMARS-E Privacy + PII + PHI + Minimum Necessary + HIPAA Privacy Rule + NIST 800-122 + 45 CFR 164 Subpart E

High-Risk Processing(3 mappings)

AUPRV-6Sensitive Information, PIA, Privacy by Design, Children3 targets
→MARS-E-Audit-Accountability-Continuous-Monitoring-AU-Family-CM-Family-SIEM-Log-Retention-IRS-Pub-1075MARS-E Audit + Accountability + Continuous Monitoring + AU + CM Families + SIEM + IRS Pub 1075
→MARS-E-NIST-800-53-Moderate-Baseline-Catalog-v2-0-Volume-III-Tailoring-Risk-Assessment-CategorizationMARS-E NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline + MARS-E Catalog Volume III + Tailoring + Risk Assessment + Categorization
→MARS-E-Privacy-PII-PHI-Minimum-Necessary-HIPAA-Privacy-Rule-NIST-800-122-45-CFR-164-Subpart-EMARS-E Privacy + PII + PHI + Minimum Necessary + HIPAA Privacy Rule + NIST 800-122 + 45 CFR 164 Subpart E

Breach Response(1 mappings)

AUPRV-7Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response
→MARS-E-NIST-800-53-Moderate-Baseline-Catalog-v2-0-Volume-III-Tailoring-Risk-Assessment-CategorizationMARS-E NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline + MARS-E Catalog Volume III + Tailoring + Risk Assessment + Categorization

Related Comparisons

Other Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) comparisons

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs India DPDP Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Jamaica Data Protection Act 20207 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappings

Other MARS-E comparisons

Turkey KVKK vs MARS-E7 mappingsISO 27018 vs MARS-E7 mappingsISO 13485 vs MARS-E7 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs MARS-E7 mappingsISO 27799 vs MARS-E7 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E7 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MARS-E7 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs MARS-E7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and MARS-E?

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 8 controls across its framework, while MARS-E covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights, where 7 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct MARS-E equivalent.

How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and MARS-E?

Of 8 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 0 map directly to MARS-E controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to MARS-E?

48 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in MARS-E. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and MARS-E?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.