Cross-Framework Mapping

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsIowa Consumer Data Protection Act

See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

42
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act with 25% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 42 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

APA-09Right to data portability
IA-CDPA-09Right to data portability

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Security(19 mappings)

APA-13Encryption of personal data5 targets
IA-CDPA-02Consent management and withdrawal
IA-CDPA-04Purpose limitation and specification
IA-CDPA-05Data minimization requirements
IA-CDPA-13Children's Data under COPPA Alignment
IA-CDPA-13Children's Data under COPPA Alignment
APA-15Access control for personal data5 targets
IA-CDPA-02Consent management and withdrawal
IA-CDPA-04Purpose limitation and specification
IA-CDPA-05Data minimization requirements
IA-CDPA-15Sale Disclosure Statement
IA-CDPA-15Sale Disclosure Statement
APA-16Data breach notification requirements7 targets
IA-CDPA-02Consent management and withdrawal
IA-CDPA-04Purpose limitation and specification
IA-CDPA-05Data minimization requirements
IA-CDPA-16Attorney General Cure Period
IA-CDPA-16Attorney General Cure Period
IA-CDPA-17Anti-Discrimination in Rights Exercise
IA-CDPA-17Anti-Discrimination in Rights Exercise
APA-17Security incident response procedures2 targets
IA-CDPA-16Attorney General Cure Period
IA-CDPA-16Attorney General Cure Period

+22 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 719 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 719 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act?

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 48 controls across its framework, while Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights, where 6 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act equivalent.

How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act?

Of 48 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 12 map directly to Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act?

36 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.