TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act

See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
88%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act with 88% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Collection and Notice.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Open Management and Accountability(1 mappings)

AUPRV-1APP 1 Open and Transparent Management + Privacy Management Framework
→INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasisIndiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is Necessary

Use and Disclosure(1 mappings)

AUPRV-3APP 6-9 Use/Disclosure, Direct Marketing, Cross-Border, Government Identifiers
→INCDPA-Processor-Contracts-DPA-Subprocessor-Audit-Confidentiality-EndOfContractIndiana CDPA Processor Contracts - Data Processing Agreement (DPA) + Required Provisions + Subprocessor Approval + Confidentiality + End of Contract Deletion + Audit Rights + Assistance

Quality and Security(2 mappings)

AUPRV-4APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information2 targets
→INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasisIndiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is Necessary
→INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification

Individual Rights(1 mappings)

AUPRV-5APP 12-13 Access and Correction of Personal Information
→INCDPA-ConsumerRights-Access-Correction-Deletion-Portability-OptOut-TargetedAd-Sale-Profiling-Appeal-45DayIndiana CDPA Consumer Rights - Access + Correction + Deletion + Portability + Opt-Out of Targeted Advertising/Sale/Profiling + 45-Day Response + 45-Day Extension + Authorised Agent + Appeal Process

High-Risk Processing(4 mappings)

AUPRV-6Sensitive Information, PIA, Privacy by Design, Children4 targets
→INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasisIndiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is Necessary
→INCDPA-Processor-Contracts-DPA-Subprocessor-Audit-Confidentiality-EndOfContractIndiana CDPA Processor Contracts - Data Processing Agreement (DPA) + Required Provisions + Subprocessor Approval + Confidentiality + End of Contract Deletion + Audit Rights + Assistance
→INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification
→INCDPA-SensitiveData-Children-Consent-COPPA-DataProtectionAssessment-DPIAIndiana CDPA Sensitive Data + Consent for Sensitive Categories + Children Under 13 + COPPA Coordination + Data Protection Assessment (DPA) + High-Risk Processing

Breach Response(2 mappings)

AUPRV-7Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response2 targets
→INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasisIndiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is Necessary
→INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification

Governance, Training, Enforcement(3 mappings)

AUPRV-8OAIC Cooperation, Vendor Management, Training, Complaints, Enforcement3 targets
→INCDPA-Enforcement-30DayCure-AttorneyGeneralOnly-NoPrivateRight-CivilPenalties-7500-PerViolationIndiana CDPA Enforcement - Attorney General Exclusive + 30-Day Cure Period + No Private Right of Action + Civil Penalties Up to USD 7500 Per Violation + Investigation + Compliance
→INCDPA-Processor-Contracts-DPA-Subprocessor-Audit-Confidentiality-EndOfContractIndiana CDPA Processor Contracts - Data Processing Agreement (DPA) + Required Provisions + Subprocessor Approval + Confidentiality + End of Contract Deletion + Audit Rights + Assistance
→INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification

Related Comparisons

Other Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) comparisons

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs India DPDP Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Jamaica Data Protection Act 20207 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs South Korea PIPA7 mappings

Other Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act comparisons

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsIowa Consumer Data Protection Act vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsFederal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 8 controls across its framework, while Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (88% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Collection and Notice, where 1 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act equivalent.

How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

Of 8 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 7 map directly to Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls — representing 88% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

1 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Collection and Notice with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Collection and Notice (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.