Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsFISMA
See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to FISMA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to FISMA with 38% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.
Quality and Security(2 mappings)
High-Risk Processing(3 mappings)
Breach Response(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) comparisons
Other FISMA comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 700 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and FISMA?
Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 8 controls across its framework, while FISMA covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights, where 7 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct FISMA equivalent.
How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and FISMA?
Of 8 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 0 map directly to FISMA controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to FISMA?
48 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in FISMA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and FISMA?
The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.