Cross-Framework Mapping

BSI IT-GrundschutzvsFISMA

See exactly how BSI IT-Grundschutz controls map to FISMA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
146
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BSI IT-Grundschutz maps to FISMA with 12% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 166 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls identifies 146 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 166 controls analysed | 1,248 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 1,248 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz(20 mappings)

BSI-01Account management and provisioning
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
BSI-02Access enforcement and least privilege
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
BSI-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
BSI-04Remote access controls
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
BSI-05Wireless access restrictions
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
BSI-08Cryptographic protection of data
→FISMA-NIST-800-53-RMF-800-171-FIPSOperationalisation via NIST 800-53 + 800-37 RMF + 800-171 + FIPS 199 + FIPS 200
BSI-13Risk assessment procedures3 targets
→FISMA-3554-Agency-ResponsibilitiesFederal Agency Responsibilities (44 USC 3554) - CIO + CISO + Program + Reporting
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
→FISMA-NIST-800-53-RMF-800-171-FIPSOperationalisation via NIST 800-53 + 800-37 RMF + 800-171 + FIPS 199 + FIPS 200
BSI-14Vulnerability scanning and management
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
BSI-15Security categorization3 targets
→FISMA-3554-Agency-ResponsibilitiesFederal Agency Responsibilities (44 USC 3554) - CIO + CISO + Program + Reporting
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
→FISMA-NIST-800-53-RMF-800-171-FIPSOperationalisation via NIST 800-53 + 800-37 RMF + 800-171 + FIPS 199 + FIPS 200
BSI-16Threat intelligence integration
→FISMA-NIST-800-53-RMF-800-171-FIPSOperationalisation via NIST 800-53 + 800-37 RMF + 800-171 + FIPS 199 + FIPS 200
BSI-17Continuous monitoring strategy3 targets
→FISMA-3554-Agency-ResponsibilitiesFederal Agency Responsibilities (44 USC 3554) - CIO + CISO + Program + Reporting
→FISMA-CIRCIA-ZTA-EO14028CIRCIA, Zero Trust Architecture, EO 14028 + 14110 + OMB Memoranda
→FISMA-NIST-800-53-RMF-800-171-FIPSOperationalisation via NIST 800-53 + 800-37 RMF + 800-171 + FIPS 199 + FIPS 200
BSI-18Incident response planning and testing2 targets
→FISMA-3554-Agency-ResponsibilitiesFederal Agency Responsibilities (44 USC 3554) - CIO + CISO + Program + Reporting
→FISMA-NIST-800-53-RMF-800-171-FIPSOperationalisation via NIST 800-53 + 800-37 RMF + 800-171 + FIPS 199 + FIPS 200
BSI-20Incident reporting and notification
→FISMA-3554-Agency-ResponsibilitiesFederal Agency Responsibilities (44 USC 3554) - CIO + CISO + Program + Reporting

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 1,248 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A BSI IT-Grundschutz to FISMA crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FISMA controls your existing BSI IT-Grundschutz work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

BSI IT-Grundschutz into FISMA
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FISMA into BSI IT-Grundschutz
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

BSI IT-Grundschutz to FISMA (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 12% in the header counts how many BSI IT-Grundschutz controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FISMA controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,248 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,248 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BSI IT-Grundschutz and FISMA?

BSI IT-Grundschutz has 166 controls across its framework, while FISMA covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz, where 35 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct FISMA equivalent.

How many controls map between BSI IT-Grundschutz and FISMA?

Of 166 total BSI IT-Grundschutz controls, 20 map directly to FISMA controls, representing 12% coverage. The remaining 146 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BSI IT-Grundschutz to FISMA?

146 BSI IT-Grundschutz controls have no direct equivalent in FISMA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz with 35 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BSI IT-Grundschutz and FISMA?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – BSI IT-Grundschutz (35 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are judged interpretations, grounded in the source text of both frameworks, and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.