OWASP API Security Top 10:2023vsCWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)
See exactly how OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 controls map to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 maps to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) with 40% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Configuration and Inventory.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Authorization(9 mappings)
Authentication and Access(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 comparisons
Other CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?
OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 has 10 controls across its framework, while CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Configuration and Inventory, where 2 OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 controls have no direct CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) equivalent.
How many controls map between OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?
Of 10 total OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 controls, 4 map directly to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 to CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?
6 OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024). The highest concentration of gaps is in Configuration and Inventory with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP API Security Top 10:2023 and CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Configuration and Inventory (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.