Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsCSA CCM v4

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

43
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
69%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to CSA CCM v4 with 69% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain and Dependencies.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authorization and Access Control(19 mappings)

A01:2025Broken Access Control4 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration9 targets
CSA-CCC-04Unauthorized change protection
CSA-CCC-08Exception management
CSA-CEK-01Encryption and key management policy
CSA-CEK-18Key archival
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication
CSA-IAM-15Passwords management
CSA-IVS-04OS hardening and base controls
CSA-LOG-10Encryption monitoring and reporting
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control3 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization3 targets
CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms

Supply Chain and Dependencies(1 mappings)

A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures
CSA-STA-04Supply chain data security assessment

+23 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CSA CCM v4?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 16 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (69% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain and Dependencies, where 2 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CSA CCM v4?

Of 16 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 11 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 69% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to CSA CCM v4?

5 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain and Dependencies with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain and Dependencies (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.