Cross-Framework Mapping

O-RAN WG11 Security SpecificationvsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

O-RAN WG11 Security Specification maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Threat Model and Risk Management(1 mappings)

ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture
OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components

O-RAN Interface Security(4 mappings)

ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul4 targets
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures

Cryptography, Protocols, PKI(3 mappings)

ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management3 targets
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)

Security Test and Certification(1 mappings)

ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control

Logging, Monitoring, IR, DoS(1 mappings)

ORANWG11-7Logging, Monitoring, Incident Response, and Denial-of-Service Resilience
OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and OWASP Top 10:2025?

O-RAN WG11 Security Specification has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust, where 1 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 8 total O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls, 5 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping O-RAN WG11 Security Specification to OWASP Top 10:2025?

3 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.