O-RAN WG11 Security SpecificationvsISO/IEC 27400:2022
See exactly how O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
O-RAN WG11 Security Specification maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Logging, Monitoring, IR, DoS.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Threat Model and Risk Management(2 mappings)
O-RAN Interface Security(5 mappings)
Cryptography, Protocols, PKI(5 mappings)
Security Test and Certification(3 mappings)
Supply Chain, SDLC, Privacy, Trust(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other O-RAN WG11 Security Specification comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
O-RAN WG11 Security Specification has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Logging, Monitoring, IR, DoS, where 1 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
Of 8 total O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping O-RAN WG11 Security Specification to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
3 O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Logging, Monitoring, IR, DoS with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between O-RAN WG11 Security Specification and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is Logging, Monitoring, IR, DoS (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.