NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)vsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule
See exactly how NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls map to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) maps to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule with 51% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance and Program Structure.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Technical Safeguards(20 mappings)
+23 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons
Other US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?
NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) has 35 controls across its framework, while US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (51% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance and Program Structure, where 5 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule equivalent.
How many controls map between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?
Of 35 total NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls, 18 map directly to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls — representing 51% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?
17 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct equivalent in US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance and Program Structure with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?
The domain with the highest gap count is Governance and Program Structure (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.