NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)vsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)
See exactly how NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls map to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) maps to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) with 34% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technical Safeguards.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Technical Safeguards(3 mappings)
Class A Company Enhanced Requirements(1 mappings)
Training and Awareness(1 mappings)
Incident Response and Notification(3 mappings)
Governance and Program Structure(8 mappings)
Risk Assessment and Security Controls(4 mappings)
+1 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons
Other Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?
NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) has 35 controls across its framework, while Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Safeguards, where 12 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) equivalent.
How many controls map between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?
Of 35 total NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls, 12 map directly to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?
23 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct equivalent in Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Safeguards with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Safeguards (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.