NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)vsISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model
See exactly how NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls map to ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) maps to ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model with 20% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technical Safeguards.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Technical Safeguards(5 mappings)
Class A Company Enhanced Requirements(1 mappings)
Governance and Program Structure(4 mappings)
Risk Assessment and Security Controls(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model?
NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Safeguards, where 12 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model equivalent.
How many controls map between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model?
Of 35 total NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) to ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model?
28 NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Safeguards with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) and ISO/IEC 25012:2008 — Data Quality Model?
The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Safeguards (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.