Cross-Framework Mapping

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility CybersecurityvsISO 27002:2022

See exactly how NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls map to ISO 27002:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
79%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity maps to ISO 27002:2022 with 79% coverage across 26 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls identifies 7 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Regulatory Guide 5.71 Appendix C Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 11 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.

10 CFR 73.54 Programme Requirements(6 mappings)

NRC-73.54(a)Cyber Security Program Scope
iso-27002-2022::5.1Policies for information security
NRC-73.54(c)Cyber Security Plan
iso-27002-2022::5.1Policies for information security
NRC-73.54(d)(1)Senior Responsible Officer Accountability
iso-27002-2022::5.4Management responsibilities
NRC-73.54(d)(2)Cyber Security Roles and Responsibilities
iso-27002-2022::5.2Information security roles and responsibilities
NRC-73.54(d)(3)Training, Awareness, and Qualification
iso-27002-2022::6.3Information security awareness, education and training
NRC-73.54(h)Cyber Security Program Review
iso-27002-2022::5.35Independent review of information security

Critical Digital Assets and Defensive Architecture(4 mappings)

NRC-73.54(b)(1)Critical Digital Asset Identification
iso-27002-2022::5.9Inventory of information and other associated assets
NRC-73.54(b)(2)Defensive Architecture
iso-27002-2022::8.22Segregation of networks
NRC-73.54(b)(3)Application of Security Controls to CDAs
iso-27002-2022::5.36Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
NRC-73.54(f)Defense in Depth
iso-27002-2022::8.27Secure system architecture and engineering principles

Attack Mitigation and Monitoring(3 mappings)

NRC-73.54(e)(1)Attack Mitigation Capability
iso-27002-2022::5.26Response to information security incidents
NRC-73.54(e)(2)Mitigation of Adverse Impact
iso-27002-2022::5.30ICT readiness for business continuity
NRC-73.54(g)Ongoing Monitoring and Assessment
iso-27002-2022::5.36Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

Technical Controls for Critical Digital Assets(5 mappings)

NRC-Access-ControlAccess Control to CDAs
iso-27002-2022::5.16Identity management
NRC-Audit-LoggingAudit and Accountability
iso-27002-2022::8.15Logging
NRC-Configuration-ManagementConfiguration Management of CDAs
iso-27002-2022::8.9Configuration management
NRC-Portable-MediaPortable Media and Mobile Devices
iso-27002-2022::7.10Storage media
NRC-Supply-ChainSupply Chain Protection
iso-27002-2022::5.21Managing information security in the ICT supply chain

Incident Reporting and Records(2 mappings)

NRC-Incident-ReportingCyber Incident Reporting to NRC
iso-27002-2022::5.5Contact with authorities
NRC-RecordsRecords of Cyber Security Program
iso-27002-2022::5.33Protection of records

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 692 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity to ISO 27002:2022 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27002:2022 controls your existing NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity into ISO 27002:2022
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 27002:2022 into NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity to ISO 27002:2022 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 79% in the header counts how many NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27002:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 692 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and ISO 27002:2022?

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity has 33 controls across its framework, while ISO 27002:2022 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 26 overlapping controls (79% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Regulatory Guide 5.71 Appendix C Security Controls, where 5 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls have no direct ISO 27002:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and ISO 27002:2022?

Of 33 total NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls, 26 map directly to ISO 27002:2022 controls, representing 79% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity to ISO 27002:2022?

7 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27002:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Regulatory Guide 5.71 Appendix C Security Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and ISO 27002:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Regulatory Guide 5.71 Appendix C Security Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.