Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-92vsOWASP MASVS

See exactly how NIST SP 800-92 controls map to OWASP MASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
48
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-92 maps to OWASP MASVS with 29% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 59 NIST SP 800-92 controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 59 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Log Management Programme(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-1Log Management Programme, Policy, Roles, and Operational Runbooks
OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection

Log Generation(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-2Log Generation: OS, Application, Security Tools, Network, Cloud, Required Event Content
OWASPMASVS-1MASVS-STORAGE: Storage of Sensitive Data

Log Infrastructure(2 mappings)

NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance2 targets
OWASPMASVS-2MASVS-CRYPTO: Cryptography Usage
OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication

Log Management Operations(3 mappings)

NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control3 targets
OWASPMASVS-2MASVS-CRYPTO: Cryptography Usage
OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization
OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication

Log Analysis and Detection(2 mappings)

NISTSP92-5Log Analysis: Correlation, Baselining, Anomaly Detection, Alerting, Manual Review2 targets
OWASPMASVS-6MASVS-CODE: Code Quality, Build Settings, and Updates
OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection

Log Retention and Disposition(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-6Log Retention: Policy, Tiered Storage, Backup, Secure Disposal, Legal Hold
OWASPMASVS-7MASVS-RESILIENCE: Resilience Against Reverse Engineering

Privacy + Cloud/SaaS Logs(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-7Privacy in Logs, Sensitive Content Handling, Cloud and SaaS Log Considerations
OWASPMASVS-1MASVS-STORAGE: Storage of Sensitive Data

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-92 and OWASP MASVS?

NIST SP 800-92 has 59 controls across its framework, while OWASP MASVS covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity, where 1 NIST SP 800-92 controls have no direct OWASP MASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-92 and OWASP MASVS?

Of 59 total NIST SP 800-92 controls, 7 map directly to OWASP MASVS controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-92 to OWASP MASVS?

1 NIST SP 800-92 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP MASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-92 and OWASP MASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration with NIST Family and Maturity (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.