Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-92vsIEC 62443

See exactly how NIST SP 800-92 controls map to IEC 62443. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-92 maps to IEC 62443 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-92 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 control mappings across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.

Log Infrastructure(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance
→IEC62443-13Network security monitoring

Log Management Operations(3 mappings)

NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control3 targets
→IEC62443-07Personnel risk assessment
→IEC62443-08Electronic access perimeter management
→IEC62443-10Revocation of access procedures

Log Analysis and Detection(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-5Log Analysis: Correlation, Baselining, Anomaly Detection, Alerting, Manual Review
→IEC62443-12Malware prevention for operational systems

Log Retention and Disposition(3 mappings)

NISTSP92-6Log Retention: Policy, Tiered Storage, Backup, Secure Disposal, Legal Hold3 targets
→IEC62443-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
→IEC62443-17Recovery plan for critical systems
→IEC62443-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

Privacy + Cloud/SaaS Logs(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-7Privacy in Logs, Sensitive Content Handling, Cloud and SaaS Log Considerations
→IEC62443-02System security categorization
Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-92 to IEC 62443 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which IEC 62443 controls your existing NIST SP 800-92 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-92 into IEC 62443
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

IEC 62443 into NIST SP 800-92
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-92 to IEC 62443 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 62% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-92 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many IEC 62443 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,016 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-92 and IEC 62443?

NIST SP 800-92 has 8 controls across its framework, while IEC 62443 covers 385 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity, where 1 NIST SP 800-92 controls have no direct IEC 62443 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-92 and IEC 62443?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-92 controls, 5 map directly to IEC 62443 controls, representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-92 to IEC 62443?

3 NIST SP 800-92 controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62443. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-92 and IEC 62443?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration with NIST Family and Maturity (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.