TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-144vsOWASP MASVS

See exactly how NIST SP 800-144 controls map to OWASP MASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-144 maps to OWASP MASVS with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-144 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Encryption and Keys.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance and Trust(2 mappings)

NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation2 targets
→OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization
→OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection

Architecture and Isolation(1 mappings)

NISTSP144-2Cloud Architecture, Service Selection, and Tenant Isolation
→OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication

Identity and Access(3 mappings)

NISTSP144-5Identity and Access in Cloud, Federation, and Privileged Access3 targets
→OWASPMASVS-1MASVS-STORAGE: Storage of Sensitive Data
→OWASPMASVS-2MASVS-CRYPTO: Cryptography Usage
→OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication

Availability and Resilience(1 mappings)

NISTSP144-6Availability, Resilience, BCP/DR, and SLA Management
→OWASPMASVS-7MASVS-RESILIENCE: Resilience Against Reverse Engineering

Workload and Configuration(1 mappings)

NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration
→OWASPMASVS-6MASVS-CODE: Code Quality, Build Settings, and Updates

Monitoring and IR(1 mappings)

NISTSP144-8Monitoring, Incident Response, Exit Strategy, and Compliance
→OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-144 comparisons

NIST SP 800-144 vs ISO 270187 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs Azure Security Benchmark7 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents7 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO 270177 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar7 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO/IEC 27011:20247 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs OWASP ASVS6 mappings

Other OWASP MASVS comparisons

ISO 27017 vs OWASP MASVS7 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs OWASP MASVS7 mappingsISO 27043 vs OWASP MASVS7 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs OWASP MASVS7 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs OWASP MASVS7 mappingsISO 27018 vs OWASP MASVS7 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs OWASP MASVS7 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-144 and OWASP MASVS?

NIST SP 800-144 has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP MASVS covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Encryption and Keys, where 1 NIST SP 800-144 controls have no direct OWASP MASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-144 and OWASP MASVS?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-144 controls, 6 map directly to OWASP MASVS controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-144 to OWASP MASVS?

2 NIST SP 800-144 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP MASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in Encryption and Keys with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-144 and OWASP MASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is Encryption and Keys (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.