Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)vsOWASP MASVS

See exactly how NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls map to OWASP MASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) maps to OWASP MASVS with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Post-Test Phase.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Planning(1 mappings)

NISTSP115-1Scope, Methodology, and Assessment Planning
OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection

Review Techniques(1 mappings)

NISTSP115-2Review Techniques - Documentation, Logs, Rulesets, Configurations
OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection

Target Identification(1 mappings)

NISTSP115-3Target Identification and Analysis - Network Discovery, Port and Service ID, Vuln Scanning
OWASPMASVS-6MASVS-CODE: Code Quality, Build Settings, and Updates

Operations Support(6 mappings)

NISTSP115-8Operational Considerations - Tools, Reporting Templates, ISMS Integration, Annex Material6 targets
OWASPMASVS-1MASVS-STORAGE: Storage of Sensitive Data
OWASPMASVS-2MASVS-CRYPTO: Cryptography Usage
OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization
OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication
OWASPMASVS-6MASVS-CODE: Code Quality, Build Settings, and Updates
OWASPMASVS-7MASVS-RESILIENCE: Resilience Against Reverse Engineering

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and OWASP MASVS?

NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP MASVS covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Post-Test Phase, where 1 NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls have no direct OWASP MASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and OWASP MASVS?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls, 4 map directly to OWASP MASVS controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) to OWASP MASVS?

4 NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP MASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in Post-Test Phase with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and OWASP MASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is Post-Test Phase (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.