Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP Rev 5vsOWASP ASVS

See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to OWASP ASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to OWASP ASVS with 33% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

FedRAMP: Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters(2 mappings)

FedRAMP-BaselinesFedRAMP Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters2 targets
OWASPASVS-6Stored Cryptography (V6)
OWASPASVS-9Communication Security (V9)

FedRAMP: Authorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M and System Documentation(4 mappings)

FedRAMP-BoundaryAuthorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M documentation4 targets
OWASPASVS-1Architecture, Design and Threat Modelling (V1)
OWASPASVS-2Authentication and Credential Storage (V2 + V2.4)
OWASPASVS-4Access Control (V4 + V4.3)
OWASPASVS-8Data Protection (V8 + V8.3)

FedRAMP: Continuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests(4 mappings)

FedRAMP-ConMonContinuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests3 targets
OWASPASVS-1Architecture, Design and Threat Modelling (V1)
OWASPASVS-10Malicious Code Verification (V10)
OWASPASVS-7Error Handling and Logging (V7)
FedRAMP-IncidentReportingFedRAMP incident reporting to PMO and US-CERT
OWASPASVS-8Data Protection (V8 + V8.3)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and OWASP ASVS?

FedRAMP Rev 5 has 12 controls across its framework, while OWASP ASVS covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP, where 2 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct OWASP ASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and OWASP ASVS?

Of 12 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 4 map directly to OWASP ASVS controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to OWASP ASVS?

8 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP ASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and OWASP ASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.