Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsSigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(1 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring
SIGSTORE-REK-1Signature Transparency Logging

OT System Overview and Threats(2 mappings)

NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
SIGSTORE-VER-2Supply Chain Attestation
NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
SIGSTORE-COS-2Key-Based Signing

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

Other Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Security Controls, where 6 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 3 map directly to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

18 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification. The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Security Controls with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Security Controls (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.