PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built EnvironmentsvsSigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification
See exactly how PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls map to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments maps to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification with 21% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Security Controls(7 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons
Other Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?
PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments has 24 controls across its framework, while Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 16 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls have no direct Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification equivalent.
How many controls map between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?
Of 24 total PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls, 5 map directly to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?
19 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls have no direct equivalent in Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?
The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.