UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence SuppliersvsSigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification
See exactly how UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls map to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers maps to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification with 24% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Objective A: Managing Security Risk(3 mappings)
Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack(1 mappings)
Objective C: Detecting Cyber Security Events(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons
Other Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?
UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers has 21 controls across its framework, while Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack, where 5 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls have no direct Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification equivalent.
How many controls map between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?
Of 21 total UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls, 5 map directly to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers to Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?
16 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls have no direct equivalent in Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and Sigstore — Software Artifact Signing and Verification?
The domain with the highest gap count is Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.