TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
71%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) with 71% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(15 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control5 targets
→38.1051(f)Physical Security Controls
→DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring3 targets
→38.1051(e)(1)Change Management
→EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
→GLI33-4.4Audit Trail and Logging
NIST82-CTL-04OT Patch Management3 targets
→38.1051(d)Capacity Planning
→DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management
→38.1051(e)(1)Change Management
NIST82-CTL-07OT Backup and Recovery3 targets
→38.1051(c)BC-DR Planning
→38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives
→38.1051(c)(2)Geographic Separation of Backup

OT Incident Response(5 mappings)

NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning
→38.1051(h)(4)Security Incident Response Plan Testing
NIST82-IR-02OT Anomaly Detection
→EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment3 targets
→38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives
→38.1051(h)(4)Security Incident Response Plan Testing
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IEC 6244316 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)25 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)24 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)24 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)24 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)23 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)22 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)22 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)22 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (71% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Security Controls, where 2 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 15 map directly to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls — representing 71% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?

6 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Security Controls with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Security Controls (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.