ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsOWASP Top 10:2025
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 28% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(3 mappings)
Governance(1 mappings)
Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(1 mappings)
Device(8 mappings)
Clause 6: IoT Security Controls(7 mappings)
+2 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and OWASP Top 10:2025?
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security, where 4 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and OWASP Top 10:2025?
Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 14 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to OWASP Top 10:2025?
28 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and OWASP Top 10:2025?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 8: IoT Lifecycle Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.