Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsCMMC 2.0

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to CMMC 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

140
Controls Mapped
874
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which CMMC 2.0 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to CMMC 2.0 with 14% coverage across 140 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 1,014 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 874 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 1,014 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 353 control mappings across 20 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(20 mappings)

NIST800-AC-11AC-11 Device Lock
→AC.L2-3.1.10Session Lock
NIST800-AC-12AC-12 Session Termination2 targets
→AC.L2-3.1.10Session Lock
→AC.L2-3.1.11Session Termination
NIST800-AC-17AC-17 Remote Access5 targets
→AC.L2-3.1.12Control Remote Access
→AC.L2-3.1.13Remote Access Confidentiality
→AC.L2-3.1.14Remote Access Routing
→AC.L2-3.1.15Privileged Remote Access
→SC.L2-3.13.14Voice over Internet Protocol
NIST800-AC-18AC-18 Wireless Access2 targets
→AC.L2-3.1.16Wireless Access Authorization
→AC.L2-3.1.17Wireless Access Protection
NIST800-AC-19AC-19 Access Control for Mobile Devices4 targets
→AC.L2-3.1.12Control Remote Access
→AC.L2-3.1.18Mobile Device Connection
→AC.L2-3.1.19Encrypt CUI on Mobile
→SC.L2-3.13.16Data at Rest
NIST800-AC-2AC-2 Account Management
→AC.L2-3.1.1Authorized Access Control
NIST800-AC-20AC-20 Use of External Systems2 targets
→AC.L2-3.1.20External Connections
→AC.L2-3.1.21Portable Storage Use
NIST800-AC-21AC-21 Information Sharing
→AC.L2-3.1.3Control CUI Flow
NIST800-AC-22AC-22 Publicly Accessible Content2 targets
→AC.L2-3.1.22Control Public Information
→SC.L2-3.13.5Public-Access System Separation

+333 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 1,016 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to CMMC 2.0 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CMMC 2.0 controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into CMMC 2.0 lands at 85.5%, while CMMC 2.0 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 lands at 8.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 evidence buys you for CMMC 2.0, the other asks the reverse.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into CMMC 2.0
85.5%

94 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 16 are genuine gaps.

CMMC 2.0 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
8.5%

86 of 1014 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CMMC 2.0. 928 are genuine gaps.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to CMMC 2.0
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 14% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CMMC 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,016 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and CMMC 2.0?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 1,014 controls across its framework, while CMMC 2.0 covers 110 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 140 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 120 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct CMMC 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and CMMC 2.0?

Of 1,014 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 140 map directly to CMMC 2.0 controls, representing 14% coverage. The remaining 874 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to CMMC 2.0?

874 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in CMMC 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 120 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and CMMC 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (120 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.