FedRAMP ModeratevsCMMC 2.0
See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to CMMC 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which CMMC 2.0 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Moderate maps to CMMC 2.0 with 54% coverage across 176 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 147 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CP - Contingency Planning.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 216 mapped controls across 17 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
AC - Access Control(20 mappings)
+196 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The FedRAMP Moderate to CMMC 2.0 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CMMC 2.0 controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into CMMC 2.0 lands at 98.2%, while CMMC 2.0 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 35%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for CMMC 2.0, the other asks the reverse.
108 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 2 are genuine gaps.
113 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CMMC 2.0. 210 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 54% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CMMC 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Other CMMC 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and CMMC 2.0?
FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while CMMC 2.0 covers 110 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 176 overlapping controls (54% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CP - Contingency Planning, where 20 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct CMMC 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and CMMC 2.0?
Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 176 map directly to CMMC 2.0 controls, representing 54% coverage. The remaining 147 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to CMMC 2.0?
147 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in CMMC 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in CP - Contingency Planning with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and CMMC 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is CP - Contingency Planning (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.