NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning GuidevsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)
See exactly how NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls map to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide maps to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) with 35% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Contingency Planning Fundamentals(9 mappings)
Contingency Plan Development(5 mappings)
Contingency Strategy Development(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide comparisons
Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide has 17 controls across its framework, while CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance, where 4 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls have no direct CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
Of 17 total NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls, 6 map directly to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
11 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls have no direct equivalent in CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). The highest concentration of gaps is in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.