TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning GuidevsOWASP ASVS

See exactly how NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls map to OWASP ASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide maps to OWASP ASVS with 35% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Contingency Planning Fundamentals(4 mappings)

CP34-FND-01Contingency Planning Policy
→ASVS-04Roles and responsibilities definition
CP34-FND-02Business Impact Analysis (BIA)
→ASVS-23Backup and recovery procedures
CP34-FND-04Recovery Prioritization2 targets
→ASVS-04Roles and responsibilities definition
→ASVS-23Backup and recovery procedures

Contingency Plan Development(2 mappings)

CP34-PLN-03Recovery Operations
→ASVS-23Backup and recovery procedures
CP34-PLN-05Roles and Responsibilities
→ASVS-04Roles and responsibilities definition

Contingency Strategy Development(4 mappings)

CP34-STR-01Backup Strategy4 targets
→ASVS-16Cryptographic policy and key management
→ASVS-17Encryption of data at rest
→ASVS-18Encryption of data in transit
→ASVS-20Key lifecycle management

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide comparisons

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs South Korea ISMS-P7 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange7 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs BSIMM6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)6 mappings

Other OWASP ASVS comparisons

3GPP Security vs OWASP ASVS17 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs OWASP ASVS17 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs OWASP ASVS17 mappingsOWASP SAMM vs OWASP ASVS17 mappingsISO 27043 vs OWASP ASVS17 mappingsNIST SP 800-187 vs OWASP ASVS17 mappingsNIST SP 800-123 vs OWASP ASVS17 mappingsNIST SP 800-161 vs OWASP ASVS17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and OWASP ASVS?

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide has 17 controls across its framework, while OWASP ASVS covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance, where 4 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls have no direct OWASP ASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and OWASP ASVS?

Of 17 total NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls, 6 map directly to OWASP ASVS controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide to OWASP ASVS?

11 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP ASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and OWASP ASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.