TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning GuidevsSouth Korea ISMS-P

See exactly how NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 41% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Contingency Planning Fundamentals(6 mappings)

CP34-FND-01Contingency Planning Policy
→ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
CP34-FND-02Business Impact Analysis (BIA)2 targets
→ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
→ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
CP34-FND-04Recovery Prioritization3 targets
→ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
→ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
→ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Contingency Plan Development(3 mappings)

CP34-PLN-03Recovery Operations2 targets
→ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
→ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
CP34-PLN-05Roles and Responsibilities
→ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management

Contingency Strategy Development(1 mappings)

CP34-STR-01Backup Strategy
→ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation

Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance(1 mappings)

CP34-TST-02Test Documentation and After-Action Reports
→ISMSP-MS-04Management Review and Improvement

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide comparisons

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange7 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs BSIMM6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)6 mappings

Other South Korea ISMS-P comparisons

FedRAMP Rev 5 vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs South Korea ISMS-P14 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs South Korea ISMS-P14 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs South Korea ISMS-P14 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and South Korea ISMS-P?

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide has 17 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance, where 3 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and South Korea ISMS-P?

Of 17 total NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls, 7 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide to South Korea ISMS-P?

10 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and South Korea ISMS-P?

The domain with the highest gap count is Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.