NIST SP 800-30vsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
See exactly how NIST SP 800-30 controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-30 maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-30 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Communication and Sharing.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Risk Management Strategy(2 mappings)
Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping(2 mappings)
Threat Source and Event Identification(3 mappings)
Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification(3 mappings)
Risk Determination(3 mappings)
Risk Assessment Maintenance and RMF Integration(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-30 comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-30 and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
NIST SP 800-30 has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Communication and Sharing, where 1 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-30 and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
Of 8 total NIST SP 800-30 controls, 6 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-30 to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
2 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Communication and Sharing with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-30 and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Communication and Sharing (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.