Cross-Framework Mapping

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and EthicsvsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

See exactly how ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 35% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls identifies 24 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Operations Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 691 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 691 frameworks.

Human Involvement in AI-Augmented Decision-Making(1 mappings)

AIGE-HI-5Mitigate automation bias and protect affected groups
AIRMF-MN-1.1A determination is made as to whether the AI system achieves its intended purpose and stated objectives and whether its development or deployment should proceed

Internal Governance Structures and Measures(4 mappings)

AIGE-IG-1Establish internal AI governance structures and oversight body
AIRMF-GV-2.1Roles and responsibilities and lines of communication related to mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks are documented and are clear to individuals and teams throughout the organization
AIGE-IG-2Define roles and responsibilities for AI oversight
AIRMF-GV-2.1Roles and responsibilities and lines of communication related to mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks are documented and are clear to individuals and teams throughout the organization
AIGE-IG-5Periodic review of the governance model
AIRMF-MN-4.1Post-deployment AI system monitoring plans are implemented, including mechanisms for capturing and evaluating input from users and other relevant AI actors, appeal and override, decommissioning, incident response, recovery, and change management
AIGE-IG-6Apply risk-based proportionality
AIRMF-MP-1.1Intended purpose, potentially beneficial uses, context-specific laws, norms and expectations, and prospective settings in which the AI system will be deployed are understood and documented

Operations Management(5 mappings)

AIGE-OM-10Third-party and vendor AI governance
AIRMF-MN-3.1AI risks and benefits from third-party resources are regularly monitored, and risk controls are applied and documented
AIGE-OM-3Bias identification and mitigation
AIRMF-MS-2.11Fairness and bias as identified in the MAP function is evaluated and results are documented
AIGE-OM-5Model explainability
AIRMF-MS-2.8Risks associated with transparency and accountability as identified in the MAP function are examined and documented
AIGE-OM-7Robustness and security testing
AIRMF-MS-2.7AI system security and resilience as identified in the MAP function are evaluated and documented
AIGE-OM-9Deployment, monitoring and review
AIRMF-MN-2.1Resources required to manage AI risks are taken into account, along with viable non-AI alternative systems, approaches, or methods, to reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts

Guiding Principles(3 mappings)

AIGE-P3Security and Safety
AIRMF-MS-2.7AI system security and resilience as identified in the MAP function are evaluated and documented
AIGE-P6Accountability and Integrity
AIRMF-GV-2.1Roles and responsibilities and lines of communication related to mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks are documented and are clear to individuals and teams throughout the organization
AIGE-P7Robustness and Reliability
AIRMF-MS-2.7AI system security and resilience as identified in the MAP function are evaluated and documented
Coverage crosswalk

A ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls your existing ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics into NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) into ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 35% in the header counts how many ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics comparisons

Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 691 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 691 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 72 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations Management, where 5 ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

Of 37 total ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls, 13 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, representing 35% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

24 ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.