Cross-Framework Mapping

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and EthicsvsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

See exactly how ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
57%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 57% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Stakeholder Interaction and Communication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Human Involvement in AI-Augmented Decision-Making(4 mappings)

AIGE-HI-1Establish AI objectives and assess against principles and risks
AIRMF-MAP-01AI System Context
AIGE-HI-2Assess probability and severity of harm
AIRMF-MAP-03AI Impact Assessment
AIGE-HI-4Document risk impact assessments
AIRMF-MAP-03AI Impact Assessment
AIGE-HI-5Mitigate automation bias and protect affected groups
AIRMF-MN-1.1AI risks are prioritised and resources are allocated to manage them

Internal Governance Structures and Measures(7 mappings)

AIGE-IG-1Establish internal AI governance structures and oversight body2 targets
AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies
AIRMF-GV-2.1Roles and responsibilities related to AI risk management are documented and clear
AIGE-IG-2Define roles and responsibilities for AI oversight
AIRMF-GV-2.1Roles and responsibilities related to AI risk management are documented and clear
AIGE-IG-3AI ethics policies, standards and code of conduct
AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies
AIGE-IG-4Training, awareness and capability building
AIRMF-GOV-02AI Risk Culture
AIGE-IG-5Periodic review of the governance model
AIRMF-MN-4.1AI risk management documentation and processes are improved continuously
AIGE-IG-6Apply risk-based proportionality
AIRMF-MP-1.1Context of AI system use is established and understood

Operations Management(7 mappings)

AIGE-OM-1Project governance and problem statement definition
AIRMF-MAP-01AI System Context
AIGE-OM-10Third-party and vendor AI governance2 targets
AIRMF-GOV-04Third-Party AI Risk
AIRMF-MN-3.1AI risks and benefits from third party resources are managed
AIGE-OM-3Bias identification and mitigation
AIRMF-MS-2.11Fairness and bias are evaluated and results documented
AIGE-OM-5Model explainability
AIRMF-MS-2.8AI system explainability and interpretability are evaluated
AIGE-OM-7Robustness and security testing
AIRMF-MS-2.7AI system security and resilience are evaluated
AIGE-OM-9Deployment, monitoring and review
AIRMF-MN-2.1Mechanisms for tracking identified risks over time are in place

Guiding Principles(2 mappings)

AIGE-P1Transparency and Explainability
AIRMF-MEA-03AI Transparency and Explainability
AIGE-P2Fairness and Equity
AIRMF-MEA-02Bias and Fairness Assessment

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics comparisons

Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (57% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Stakeholder Interaction and Communication, where 4 ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

Of 37 total ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls, 21 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 57% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

16 ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in Stakeholder Interaction and Communication with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Stakeholder Interaction and Communication (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.