Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsISO 31000

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to ISO 31000. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to ISO 31000 with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(1 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
ISO31000-19Continuous improvement of risk processes

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment3 targets
ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis

Incident Response and Media Protection(6 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition3 targets
ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO31000-05Risk management integration
ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO31000-05Risk management integration
ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Other ISO 31000 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 31000?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 31000 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 15 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct ISO 31000 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 31000?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 4 map directly to ISO 31000 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to ISO 31000?

31 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 31000. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 31000?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.