Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 20% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Incident Response and Media Protection(8 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
3.6Incident Response3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
3.6.1Incident Response Plan Assessment3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

3.3Record Completion and Maintenance3 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

System Protection and Communications(7 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings3 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup4 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Other ISO 22320:2018 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 22320:2018?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 13 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 7 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to ISO 22320:2018?

28 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.