Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 23% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance(3 mappings)

CPS234-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(1 mappings)

CPS234-12Disaster recovery procedures
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process

Third Party(1 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(3 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
CPS234-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

Asset Management(1 mappings)

CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

Controls(3 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting(8 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security2 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 22320:2018?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 13 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to ISO 22320:2018?

32 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.