Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 32% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance(3 mappings)

CPS234-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(1 mappings)

CPS234-12Disaster recovery procedures
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process

APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(3 mappings)

CPS234-16Due diligence and onboarding
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
CPS234-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
CPS234-20Exit strategy and transition planning
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting(9 mappings)

CPS234-21Incident detection and classification3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
CPS234-23Regulatory reporting requirements3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
CPS234-25Post-incident review and improvement3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 22320:2018?

APRA CPS 234 has 25 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 25 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 8 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to ISO 22320:2018?

17 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.