TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
91
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 2% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 NIST SP 800-171 controls identifies 91 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Audit and Accountability Assessment(1 mappings)

3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Incident Response Assessment(1 mappings)

3.6.1Incident Response Capability
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171 comparisons

NIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 537 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-2079 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs ACSC Essential Eight4 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-1462 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-1452 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-1442 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs MTCS (Singapore)2 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

NIST SP 800-171 has 93 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 7 NIST SP 800-171 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 93 total NIST SP 800-171 controls, 2 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 91 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

91 NIST SP 800-171 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.