Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsDAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
88
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) with 10% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 103 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 93 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 103 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 820K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 820K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

DE - Detect(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria3 targets
DA-1Enterprise Data Architecture
DIQ-2Data Quality Management
RMD-1Reference Data Management

PR - Protect(9 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
DSO-3Data Access Management
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
DSO-3Data Access Management
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed4 targets
DA-1Enterprise Data Architecture
DIQ-2Data Quality Management
DSO-3Data Access Management
RMD-1Reference Data Management
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
RMD-1Reference Data Management
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
RMD-1Reference Data Management
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
RMD-1Reference Data Management

RC - Recover(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
DIQ-1Data Integration and Interoperability
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
DIQ-1Data Integration and Interoperability

RS - Respond(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
DIQ-1Data Integration and Interoperability

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Other DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (820K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 103 controls across its framework, while DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 28 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

Of 103 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 10 map directly to DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 93 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

93 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 28 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (28 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.