TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
87
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard with 11% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 94 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

DE - Detect(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority

GV - Govern(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

ID - Identify(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

PR - Protect(10 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected3 targets
→4.3.2Legal and Other Requirements
→4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
→4.4.2Competence, Training, and Awareness
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations3 targets
→4.3.2Legal and Other Requirements
→4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
→4.4.2Competence, Training, and Awareness
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained3 targets
→4.3.2Legal and Other Requirements
→4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
→4.4.2Competence, Training, and Awareness

RC - Recover(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed2 targets
→4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response
→4.4.8Business Continuity and Recovery
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
→4.4.8Business Continuity and Recovery

RS - Respond(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
→4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
→4.4.8Business Continuity and Recovery

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsISO/IEC 27031:2011 vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 27 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 12 map directly to ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 94 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard?

94 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.