TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard with 26% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(2 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual2 targets
→4.1External Standards
→4.2Building Fabric and Facilities

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(4 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment
→4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
3.4Internal Audits2 targets
→4.1External Standards
→4.2Building Fabric and Facilities

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(2 mappings)

3.2Document Control2 targets
→4.1External Standards
→4.2Building Fabric and Facilities

Incident Response and Media Protection(3 mappings)

3.6Incident Response2 targets
→4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response
→4.4.8Business Continuity and Recovery
3.6.1Incident Response Plan Assessment
→4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response

System Protection and Communications(3 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup2 targets
→4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
→4.4.8Business Continuity and Recovery

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsLloyd's Minimum Standards — Cyber Security vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsSSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappingsBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct vs ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 13 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 9 map directly to ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard?

26 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.