OECD AI PrinciplesvsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics
See exactly how OECD AI Principles controls map to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
OECD AI Principles maps to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics with 28% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 OECD AI Principles controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OECD AI Principles: AI Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.
Values-Based Principles(6 mappings)
Recommendations to Policymakers(6 mappings)
Data Governance(2 mappings)
Transparency(1 mappings)
Cross-Border(1 mappings)
Accountability(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other OECD AI Principles comparisons
Other ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 730 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between OECD AI Principles and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
OECD AI Principles has 46 controls across its framework, while ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OECD AI Principles: AI Risk Management, where 5 OECD AI Principles controls have no direct ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics equivalent.
How many controls map between OECD AI Principles and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
Of 46 total OECD AI Principles controls, 13 map directly to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping OECD AI Principles to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
33 OECD AI Principles controls have no direct equivalent in ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics. The highest concentration of gaps is in OECD AI Principles: AI Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between OECD AI Principles and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?
The domain with the highest gap count is OECD AI Principles: AI Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.