Cross-Framework Mapping

OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)vsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics

See exactly how OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls map to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) maps to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Reporting and Information Integrity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Definitions and Scope(2 mappings)

OECDAI24-1Updated AI System Definition, Foundation Models, and Generative AI Scope2 targets
AIGE-P2Fairness and Equity
AIGE-P4Human-centricity

GenAI Transparency and Provenance(1 mappings)

OECDAI24-2Generative AI Transparency, Content Provenance, and Authenticity
AIGE-P1Transparency and Explainability

Workplace AI, Children, Vulnerable Populations(1 mappings)

OECDAI24-5Workplace AI, Worker Voice, Children Protection, and Vulnerable Populations
AIGE-NR-1Nurture AI talent and upskill the workforce

Security, IP, Environment(2 mappings)

OECDAI24-6Security, Model and Data Protection, Intellectual Property, and Environmental Sustainability2 targets
AIGE-P3Security and Safety
AIGE-P7Robustness and Reliability

Deployer Responsibilities and Agentic AI(1 mappings)

OECDAI24-7Deployer Responsibilities, Agentic AI, and Engagement with Rights Holders
AIGE-P6Accountability and Integrity

Interoperability and Cross-Border(4 mappings)

OECDAI24-8Interoperability with International AI Frameworks, Public Reporting, and Cross-Border Governance4 targets
AIGE-NR-2Invest in AI research and development
AIGE-NR-3Support the AI innovation ecosystem and investment
AIGE-RR-1Establish an ASEAN Working Group on AI Governance
AIGE-RR-2Foster regional alignment, cooperation and interoperability

Related Comparisons

Other OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) comparisons

Other ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?

OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) has 8 controls across its framework, while ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Reporting and Information Integrity, where 1 OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls have no direct ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics equivalent.

How many controls map between OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?

Of 8 total OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls, 6 map directly to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) to ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?

2 OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) controls have no direct equivalent in ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Reporting and Information Integrity with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update) and ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Reporting and Information Integrity (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.